I wish to forewarn you before you commence reading this blog: it is not an easy pill to swallow. In fact, it is a damn awful pill to say the least and I imagine that not a lot else can compare to it for those singletons whose futures are inter-tangled with these facts. Yet that is what they are: facts. Not airy, fairy, pie-in-the-sky speculation, but inalienable truths for our time. This blog is relevant to New Zealand women, although certainly women from Christian churches in the Western world will be able to relate to some of this text. Despite any sense of hopelessness that arises here, as this blog will demonstrate, there is a kind of relief for us sufferers of the man drought, so, if you are willing, please read on.
It first came to my attention about six years ago that something was
amiss between the sexes in New Zealand and Auckland in particular. For one thing, it was hard to ignore what was
right in front of my eyes in the church auditorium every Sunday: lots and lots of young women, and a sparse scattering
of men. Then something much worse
happened, my speculation was realised not only by someone with access to actual
statistical numbers, but this information was then passed on for the general knowledge-consumption
of the New Zealand population. A brutal
heading boasting “Man Drought” proceeded consensus numbers detailing the number
of men verses the number of women in the 25-49 year age group. In a country holding of a modest populace of
4 million, there are 50 thousand more women than men in this age bracket. Opportunities for single women weren’t
looking good to say the least, and I believe something inside of me died that
day (specifically, a large serving of hope).
The Man Drought in New Zealand per se is not exactly what affects me,
although certainly I feel for all single women in this country who long to be
partnered up yet have thus far only been disappointed. What mattered to me the most was the grave
shortage of men in the church, after all, this is where pretty much all women I
am close to spend their time socialising, and if it wasn’t within the church
walls, then more often than not it was with other Christians.
Having grown up in the church, having been prayed for by church goers,
having been prophesized over by church leaders, having been the child of a married
couple (my parents), marriage and parenthood was just what I was expecting upon
reaching adulthood. During my youth, I
spent much of my time molly-coddling dolls, whilst dreaming of having real
babies of my own one day. I couldn’t
wait to grow up, meet that man who would be out there waiting for me, and get
married and start a family. This, more
than anything else available post-childhood, was what I wanted.
As children, we just assume
things will blossom as they should in due course
It never occurred to me during those tender years that things could
turn out any other way. During high
school, I was semi-frequently scathed by the words or actions of some
unrequited crush in the school grounds.
My mother told me that Christian boys wouldn’t treat me this way: they
wouldn’t lead me on, hurt me and then stride off leaving me in a pained state
in their wake. In my final year at high
school I learnt, however, that this statement was not accurate either. I’m sure many a Christian woman in the church
pews can relate to this passage from Job:
They
are distressed, because they had been confident
They arrive there, only to be
disappointed
Job 6:20
Hope, and then hope dashed
Up until not so long ago, I was on a desperate scavenge to find evidence that the imbalance of men and women in New Zealand would soon be resolved. Probably more often than I care to admit, I would run Google searches looking for new statistical information to confirm that, in the words of Bob Dylan, “times they are a changing’”, this time in favour of women. What I found instead was evidence that our female Australian counterparts had it almost as bad as we Kiwi women do, and that certain states in America, particularly New York, also had the same, albeit raw, deal. In short, performing searches via the likes of Google never did me an ounce of good. I am resolved not to carry out this pathetic charade anymore in future, and would urge any other woman doing it to also give it the boot.
In addition to internet searching, I was also on the
lookout for events that could improve the man drought predicament. After returning from a trip to the States in
2008, I was greeted back to this little country by news of a worldwide
recession. Even people in England couldn’t find work. I did not perceive this news as all doom and
gloom, if Kiwis living in England couldn’t find work or were made redundant,
then that simply meant, in my estimation, that they would have to return here
to the land of the Long White Cloud (note: kiwis are notorious for heading to
England for their overseas experience, and since there was not a surplus of
females during my schooling years I believe that many a kiwi man headed to Her
Majesty’s province, or similar). With
the recession in mind, I told myself that perhaps an influx of men was right around
the corner - it wasn’t.
Then, in 2011, Auckland hosted the Rugby World Cup,
an event that hailed attention on a huge, international scale and that bought
in thousands and thousands of tourists set to share in the atmosphere and see
some of the games live. Surely rugby,
being a rather masculine sport, could assist in alleviating the imbalance of
men and women. To conclude, perhaps it
did for a short while, but so far as I can tell not too many women met the men
of their dreams during those several weeks of testosterone-drenched play offs,
thus the disparity remains.
Ecclesiastes
In the first chapter of Ecclesiastes we read something
that, in my opinion, is exceedingly relevant to the present time:
What has been will be
again,
What has been done will
be done again;
There is nothing new
under the sun.
Ecclesiastes 1:9
Why, you may ask, do I think this is relevant to us
in the present generation? I’ve spent
years praying about the shortage of men, and pressing in to God for guidance or
an explanation (like I’m owed one), as I’m sure many a Christian woman have. I’ve not felt His peace when dwelling on the notion
that men will (frankly, miraculously) appear and the drought will be over. This doesn’t serve as a guarantee that I will
never marry. It also doesn’t mean that
none of my twenty or so single, Christian female friends will never marry
either (all of my female friends are single).
It does, I think, mean that the problem at large will remain. Not long after this passage came to mind (I
feel God brought it into my awareness, by the way), it occurred to me that, if
nothing is new, then somewhere there must be resources describing past
shortages of men. If such information
does exist, then there must also be details on what was the outcome for the
women affected by this disparity. I
found this information; I’ll lend you the gist of it…
Social Trauma Post World War One
An article titled “Condemned to be Virgins: The TwoMillion Women Robbed by the War” by Amanda Cable details the gender imbalance in Britain post the First World War. Based on a book describing the subject, this text reads not unlike many of the conversations I’ve had with single women in the church. “They dreamt of love, marriage and children”, the article begins, but such hopes were to be dashed.
I’d like to point out a vital difference between this
passage and the teachings Christian women tend to receive. Never have I heard a speaker blatantly preach
from the pulpit declaring Christian women won’t all end up married. Never have I heard them directly address the
glaringly obvious shortage of men in the church pews (surely, from their risen
platform, it is somewhat obvious).
Smaller groups discussing the subject, often hosted by married people,
tend to offer replies like “God doesn’t care about numbers, He is bigger than
digits” in relation to the gender disproportion. I stopped feeling comforted by such idioms a
long time ago. Yes, God is bigger than
numbers, yet unlike the insinuation from well-intentioned speakers, it doesn’t
automatically follow that God’s way of resolving this is by pairing us all off. Also, thinking logically about it, unless God
can start making new, grown men from clay again, this imbalance will
remain. I don’t believe the large number
of men who shifted away from New Zealand was a God-ordained thing, I believe it
was a man-ordained thing, and God cannot make
men do what He wants them to do (nor can He make them marry those who He has
chosen for them, more on that later).
New to the church cell group, Sharon knew she’d found
the right place
when she quickly realised there was not a man in sight
Back to my initial point. In contrast to church teaching, this article
describes how during a school assembly one day, a British Senior Mistress
mustered up the strength to make a harrowing proclamation to her female
pupils: only 10% of you will ever get
married. Her subsequent statement was
just as hard hitting: “This is not a guess of mine. It is a statistically
fact” (Cable), (italics – mine). My
heart hurt for these war-time women, and a deep empathy for how they must have
felt upon hearing this resounds within me.
Unlike kiwi men who have left our shores on their own accord, these
women would endure permanent singleness because their potential suitors were
dead. Many years on from this Bournemouth
High School assembly, statistics revealed that a whopping 35 per cent of women
in their reproductive years never married (Cable).
One girl who was present during this post-war
announcement, Rosamund Essex, later wrote a book where she recalled that disturbing
declaration. In her book her school
Mistresses words were touted as ‘prophetic’ (Cable). The word ‘prophetic’ resonated in my mind for
some time after reading the article.
Countless times I had hoped for a prophetic word for the women in my social
circle, yet even as Christians we were without such messages worthy of our
thoughts.
No hope vs false hope
Some months ago whilst once more considering how the church dispenses a blanket notion that we’ll someday all marry, I found myself wondering: what is worse? Full on, yet ultimately false hope – the kind of hope derived from putting all your hope into one specific outcome - or reasoned hope, where more than one avenue is considered? Had the church suggested to the likes of my friends and myself as part of the church body some time ago that it was likely not every member would marry (for any number of reasons), then perhaps the disappointment we are experiencing now wouldn’t be so soul-wrenching and utterly unexpected. As it were, I don’t think it ever occurred to me during my younger years that my status of being single would continue well into my adult life. After careful consideration I am at a point where I consider that perhaps reasoned hope, that is hope which is not dead set on one particular outcome only but which considers other outcomes are jointly plausible, is better than full on, albeit false, hope in this area. Why? Because false hope is a hope that will always disappoint.
I originally sort to see this comparison as a
distinction between no hope and false hope.
Having thought about it in greater length however, to cease hope in
something completely is not a goal to be aimed for. It is wise to pray for the things we would
dearly like in life, and if we really were to eradicate all traces of hope then
I think the practice of faithful praying for something that is Godly and good
(such as a husband) will be lost and buried along with our dollop of hope.
Let me share with you something else that has come to
mind these past several months. As
Christians (or people of any belief system), we all know of a person or persons
who have suffered from cancer. The
Christian sufferers and those close to them will undoubtedly pray for healing
and for the treatment to be a success.
In short: they pray to be free of this hideous, invasive disease. Yet we all know that some Christians do get
healed – be it through deliverance prayer or through chemotherapy – yet others
don’t and consequently die. So, if we
except that some Christians with cancer do live whilst others die a premature
death, then how is it that we jointly believe all Christians who desire to get
married will get married? This is but
one comparison that could be made here; I use it only because most of us will,
during the course of our lives, have lost someone to this disease (similarly, most
of us will also know of women and men who simply never found a spouse).
God has got it all figured out, girls – your husband
will still be taller
than you even when you are sporting high heels on your
wedding day.
But what about the scripture that says “The Lord will
give you the desires of your heart”.
I’m not going to spend a lot of time of this passage,
but I will make a couple of remarks on it.
Firstly, as I was typing it into the Google search engine, I’d barely
gotten three words entered when it offered the exact verse at the top of the
list of possible searches. This tells me
that a lot of people are well versed in terms of this piece of scripture. In relation to marriage, I will share what a
close friend of mine once told me this verse means. My friend believes that this verse, which in
full reads “Delight yourself in the Lord and He will give you the desires of
your heart” and is found in Psalms 37:4, means that the desires we have in our
hearts are there because the Lord put
them there. In other words, if a
desire we have (assuming it is in line with God’s word) is in our heart, it’s
because the Lord purposefully placed it in there. There seems to be a common tendency for
Christians to think this means God will
then give to us whatever those desires might be. The bible, however, doesn’t go on to say
that. Rather, it goes on to say we
should commit our ways to the Lord and trust in him, and in terms of what the
Lord will do for us, it says this:
“He will make your righteousness shine line the dawn, the justice of the cause
like the noonday sun”. Not quite that
same as getting exactly what we want now, is it?Advice from well-meaning married folk: “She obviously never got married because…” and so forth
There have been a few occasions now, mostly during
all-female hangouts, when the question of why some women are still single by
the time they reach, say, middle age has arisen. The most popular answer (according to my own remembrance
survey) that is offered to this question is that there is “obviously some
unresolved issue or problem that she has which means she’s never been able to
progress to marriage”. Again, based on
my own observation, it seems that some single Christian women even like this answer. I’ve come to the conclusion that this is
because it means that our fate is in our own hands in so far as we can gain marital
status if we simply work out our problems.
I myself used to think this was most likely the case, but then I learnt
a new theory whilst taking a paper in Psychology last year (isn’t it interesting
what God can use to expand our minds? A
bible verse here, an academic lesson there…).
The lecturer described how, as human beings, we have
a tendency to blame other people’s undesirable outcomes on some supposed
character flaw that they bare. The
example went something like this: you invite a friend over for dinner, and she
arrives twenty minutes late. You quietly
think to yourself something along the lines of “well, if she wasn’t so
disorganised”, “if she wasn’t so casual about everything, she might actual be
here on time” or similar. The point is
you blame her for the undesirable
outcome of arriving late. Your friend,
on the other hand, being the owner of the outcome, is more likely to be
thinking “How was I to know there would be so much traffic at this hour”, or
“If it wasn’t for the truck that had broken down I’d have been on time”. In contrast, the friend blames her lateness
on the situation, NOT on a personal
disposition.
You can possibly already see where I am going with
this. It can be easy for some people to
look on at single women of a certain age and say that her prolonged status of
being single is the result of something dispositional. This may be true of some women, but I personally don’t believe it is the case for the
majority in the church. I believe I am
correct in saying that most Christian women who are single currently are not single because of something
dispositional; rather, they are single because of the situation. The situation is, of course, that there is a
huge shortage of men (approximately 1 single man to every 3-4 single women –
again, this pertains only to Auckland, and numbers will vary slightly from
church to church).
One last thing about receiving advice from married
people. These folk will almost always
give advice in accordance to their own marriage-abounding experience. If they were out actively searching when they
met their future spouse, they will tell you to get out there and do the
same. If they disbanded the proactive
approach in favour of patiently waiting when the would-be spouse arrived, they
will suggest this is your ticket to success also. I will say but one thing on the matter: every person’s experience will be slightly
different, and you won’t know what method will work for you until you can look
back on it in retrospect. If you feel at
peace with what you are presently doing, don’t abandon it because of
well-intentioned words from others.
Consider that you are right where the Lord wants you, and that whilst
this may or may not result in partnership, the Lord has got you there for a
reason, whatever that reason might be.
Heeding her friend Tammy’s advice, Kylie was sure it
was only a
matter of time now before her waiting patiently would pay off and
the Fed Ex man would whisk her away to a life of marital bliss
So…….. is there any hope? What I believe we can be sure of
The realisation that my chances of ever getting
married are relatively slim is not a conclusion I am fond of fostering, nor
does it leave me with a great yearning to fling my arms open in praise of an
all-powerful, all-loving God who seemingly can’t even deliver me and my fellow
God-fearing sisters from prolonged singleness.
I’ve asked the question that probably many of us have asked at some
stage: what’s the point in living my life in accordance to God’s way? In doing so, I am still left despairing in a
pond of loneliness, not to mention living out my days as though there is no
sexual component to me. It ignores those
maternal desires that are being cast to the way-side along with the
tick-tocking of the clock. Frankly, this
all seems like an impossible bite to chew.
Furthermore, what good is waiting for ‘the right one’, if ‘the right one’
isn’t ever going to come along? I feel
God has revealed two things to me that cover these concerns.
Firstly, I believe God does have someone, or someones
plural (more than one possible suitor in the entire world seems plausible to me)
in mind for each of His children.
However, God also gave us free will.
I’ll again use an analogy here to explain. When applying for a job, God might urge us to
take one vacancy as opposed to a number of other roles that are available. We can, however, choose to rely on our own
understanding and take another offer instead.
Perhaps it pays more, perhaps there appears to be more room to climb the
corporate ladder in comparison to the door God wants to lead you through. To be flatly honest (in this analogy, and in
the actual subject at hand), perhaps it just looks more attractive! By
ignoring God’s leading though, we’ll never know why He wanted us to take one over
another, and our abundant-living will be compromised because of it. I propose the idea that God does not force
people to marry those whom He has chosen for them; like all things in life, not
excluding salvation itself, it is ultimately our choice whether or not we obey
Him. To further make the point, I’ve
also wondered how many of the men who’ve left this nation were actually called to leave (or how many were called
to stay put over there).
Secondly, there is always a reason to do things God’s way,
even if it will never amount to what we consider to be a Christian birth-right
to us here on this earth. It struck me
rather suddenly one night that if we obey God and honour Him with our body, mind
and time, and if this does not result in the marriage and family we so wanted
here in this world (after all, God is for
marriage – he invented it as he saw it wasn’t good for man to be alone), then
God has to reward us on the other side.
It is that simple. And let us not
downplay the fact that the other side is for all of eternity; things in this
life are but temporal. The bible makes
it clear that those who are first here will be last over there, and those who
are last here will be first there (Matthew 20:16). Now that is
something to be excited about. This
message was further affirmed me to whilst I was browsing through a second hand
book store before Christmas (call it shopping on a student budget). Randomly flicking open a book titled ‘The
Thorn in the Flesh’ by R.T. Kendall, my eyes fell upon these words:
Closing remarks
As I embarked on writing this
blog, I knew there was much I could say on the subject of the shortage of men
in our churches today (and on the shortage of men in New Zealand, more
generally). I’ve allowed this text to be
of reasonable length because I feel that my points are relevant to most women
who find themselves perpetually single.
In closing, there is one more thing I would like to say about dealing
with singleness as a Christian woman, and that is this: each day, take five
minutes to feel at peace with where you are at in relation to your goals on
this earth. Whether you are dating, or
haven’t had a date in years, except that this is where you are at today and
thank God for what you do have. If we
can integrate this as part of our daily lives, then the struggle of being
single, though it may never completely dissolve, will certainly begin to lose
momentum and become more tolerable.
At times this life feels long and
the loneliness can seem insurmountable.
Eternity, however, is a lot longer and promises to be more than
fulfilling for those who follow Him.
-Wendie
Reference list:
Cable, Amanda. "Condemned to Be Virgins:
The Two Million Women Robbed by the War." Daily Mail Online 2007.Kendall, R T. The Thorn in the Flesh. Florida, United State of America: Charisma House, 2004. Print.
The Committee On Bible Transation. Ecclesiastes, Job, Matthew, Psalms. The Holy Bible, New International Version. Colorado Springs: International Bible Society, 1984. Print.
This REALLY is a good post.
ReplyDeleteI write and maintain a blog which I have entitled “Accordingtothebook” and I’d like to invite you to follow it. I’m your newest follower.
Wendie, I really like this post. As a Christian woman who married for the first time at age 40, you know that I can relate to this post! There seems to be a shortage of men in the church worldwide. I especially like the two things that God revealed to you about being single and marriage. Continue to write from your heart of honesty, courage and hope. Thanks for visiting my blog Marrying Over 40 http://marryingover40.blogspot.com/
ReplyDeleteThank you, Cynthia, for your comment - it is really encouraging. Your blogs are also very heartening, especially for those of us who are still single post our twenties and need reminding from time to time that our chance hasn't run out. My mother married in her late 30s and had me at 40 so that, combined with my own experience, means I can understand where you are coming from.
DeleteAn interesting piece. Many talking points but I suppose the most prominent is the small number of single men in Church. As a Kiwi man in our neo-feminist world I can tell you church offers little for the simple man and even less for the thinking man.
ReplyDeleteI know many Christians who live corrupt lives, meanwhile I am responsible, conscientious, rarely drink, do charity and volunteer work etc. But I would rather die than be called a Christian.
I have no problem with the concepts, only the religion. Christianity and the other religions were beginning points, they are not false (not the basic ideas) but the are simplified, like books you would give to a young child. There are greater theologies that encompass far more than the Christian Church can offer.
So how would you bring single men to the church? Don't offer salvation because the simple man already has his salvation and the thinking man knows your claim to be empty. Or perhaps the more relevant question is why Christian women won't date and marry non-Christian men? I guess they missed the point of Christ's teachings?